Safety Procedures: Personal Protective Equipment: Safety’s Fall Guy

Home   »   SharePoint Health and Safety Software – EHS Software   »   EHS Training Management: Best Practices and Resources   »   Safety Procedures: Personal Protective Equipment: Safety’s Fall Guy

Personal Protective Equipment PPE Safety's Fall Guy

Personal Protective Equipment: Safety’s Fall Guy

Personal protective equipment (PPE) could be considered the ‘fall guy’ of safety management. As any safety professional knows all too well, the dogma in risk management is that PPE is the absolute last resort as a control against a given hazard or risk. There may be variations between different hierarchies of control, but without exception the use of PPE should always be considered last. Be that as it may, it is contended here that PPE gets a bad rap and deserves its rightful place in the prevention of injuries and occupational disease.

PPE does have its place in safety management, of course. According to OSHA, PPE is “designed to protect workers from serious workplace injuries or illnesses resulting from contact with chemical, radiological, physical, electrical, mechanical, or other workplace hazards”. PPE is varied and can include face shields, safety glasses, hard hats, non-slip safety shoes, protective coveralls, gloves, and earplugs. OSHA’s primary PPE standards can be found in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 1910 Subpart I, as well as equivalent regulations in those states with OSHA-approved state plans. Also important from a regulatory standpoint is OSHA’s Personal Protective Equipment Standard Compliance Directive (Directive Number: CPL 02-01-050) which came into effect in October, 2011 and which is known informally as the PPE Guidelines for General Industry. It’s important that you read them up if you haven’t already!

OSHA also insists that an organisation undertake its own PPE Hazard Assessment, and which must include all necessary PPE considerations within a management system, particularly with regard to the risk assessment process and the implementation of operational controls thereafter. Failure to do this would be a contravention of an organization’s health and safety due diligence, according to OSHA.  

The statistics keep reminding us how PPE usage is often lacking. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 1-million hospital emergency visits by workers in the U.S. could be avoided each and every year if only PPE had been worn. In 2009 alone, hand injuries cost American employers over $500-million dollars in lost time, claims, and the other costs typical of occupational injuries. That is why it so important that PPE be part of a formal incident reporting system such as ConvergePoint – the failure to use appropriate PPE is not only a system non-conformance but should even be recorded as a near miss.

There are certain tasks and workplaces that not only necessitate PPE usage, they demand it. Talk to any radiation protection officer or worker and they will quickly confirm that PPE is an essential control for their work with radiative material or equipment. Their respirators and radiation monitoring devices/badges are not ‘nice-to-haves’ but essential for their health. Ditto the worker who handles acids. The key words here are ‘pure hazards’. Pure hazards like radiation, acids and certain explosive materials are those that are inherently dangerous, i.e. they do not require other hazards or hazardous conditions to make them hazardous. Once again, any safety professional worth their salt knows this well.

The crux of the matter, however, is not the importance of PPE with regard to pure hazards or as an important yet ultimately final control. The true importance of PPE relates to those more than one million American workers who land up in hospital each year due to not having worn the correct PPE. That statistic alone proves that PPE’s reputation as the ‘poor cousin’ in safety management is not only problematic, but dangerous. That statistic suggests a lack of worker awareness or understanding of the true risks in their work, not to mention a failure in risk assessment. It even denotes a woeful lack of safety management by employers.

PPE cannot be king and master in the workplace. That is lazy safety management. However, nor can it continue to be the devalued ‘underling’ in the hierarchy if safety and health controls. Ultimately, the logic that PPE should always be the last resort may not be doing American workplace safety or workers any favors.

New Call-to-action

Download – Safety Management Software White Paper

Industries Served


Improve facility management, student health and safety, workforce and administration training, and related incidents.



Adhere to federal regulations, administer employee training programs, and enhance hospital facility management.


Manufacturing and Retail Industry

Upgrade facility management and safety measures, diminish workforce injuries, and enhance employee training programs.


Financial Services and Banking

Manage employee complaints and working conditions, injury reports, accidents, and improve compliance training programs.


Insurance and Employee Benefits

Increase training program effectiveness, reduce workplace injuries and complaints, and meet FTIC and SEC regulations.


Energy and Utilities

Abide by stringent government regulations, provide proper safety training programs, and mitigate workforce and onsite injuries.



Outline health and safety measures for drivers and pilots, abide by federal regulations, and communicate processes for hazardous materials (Hazmat).

Health and Safety Management – Best Practices:

Visit our resource library for industry best practices and how our Health and Safety Management Software has helped numerous clients in your industry.


See a Health and Safety Management Software Demo

Let us show you how our Health and Safety Management Software will strengthen your compliance program.



Subscribe to our Newsletter to get Compliance Best Practices, Informative Articles, Instructive Webinars & Industry-Insider Scoops.